Abstract—This study aimed to develop and design the
Students’ Evaluation of Teaching (SET) at Sripatum University.
The development also includes two works: 1) Development of
the SET form, its validity was considered by three experts, and
the consistency was considered between the questions on the
objective of the evaluation or IOC. Then it was tested on 41
students to analyze the reliability by Cronbach's Alpha
Coefficient. 2) Design and develop the SET report is consistent
with the new evaluation and the expert’s recommendations.
Then, a sub-groups meeting to conclude the job. Results are as
follows:
1). There are three parts to the SET form as follows: Part 1:
General information, Part 2: The Instructor’s Teaching
Competency Evaluation, and Part 3: Other suggestions. The
consistency between the questions on the objective of the
evaluation or IOC0.5.This means that all questions are
consistent with the objectives that can be applied to reality and
0.732 Cronbach's Alpha Coefficient of the SET form is at a good
level of reliability.
2). The SET report is divided into two main parts. 1)
Percentage of students’ assessment report and 2) The
Instructor’s Teaching Competency Evaluation report which is
two levels: 1) Faculty the SET report. 2) Individual the SET
report is divided into five sections as follows 2.1) Frequency and
percentage of students’ assessment, 2.2) Frequency and
percentage of students’ self-assessment, 2.3) Percentage and
average of the SET by parts, 2.4) Percentage and average of the
SET by items, and 2.5) Students’ feedback.
Index Terms—Design, students’ evaluation of teaching,
evaluation.
R. Sanitya and S. Sinjindawong are with the Sripatum University,
Thailand (e-mail: Rugsapon.sa@spu.ac.th, sirinthorn.si@spu.ac.th).
Cite: R. Sanitya and S. Sinjindawong, "Design of Students’ Evaluation of Teaching: The Case of Sripatum University," International Journal of Information and Education Technology vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 367-373, 2017.