International Journal of
Information and Education Technology

Abstract

This research aimed to 1) study the feasibility and appropriateness of E-learning lesson design using instructional strategy, 2) study the feasibility and appropriateness of E-learning lesson design using constructivism learning environment, 3) study the feasibility and appropriateness of using E-learning lesson for developing advance thinking skill of undergraduate students. The samples for the study were 25 experts on education technology and communication, on E-learning design, on curriculum and instruction. The research instruments consisted of 1) e-learning lessons designed on 9 instructional strategies; knowledge construction (PSPSKAPE), role play, inquiry based learning, CIPPA Model, collaborative learning, cooperative learning, project-based learning, problem based learning, case based learning. 2) e-learning lesson designed on constructivism learning environment; open learning environment (OLEs) and constructivist learning environment (CLEs). 3) Questionnaire. The data was statistically analyzed by percentage, mean ( x ) standard deviation (S.D.). The research findings were that 1) the feasibility of all types of e-learning design for developing higher-ordered thinking of undergraduate students was at the level of “most” ( x = 4.69, S.D.= 0.25), 2) the feasibility of e-learning lesson design using instructional strategy was at the level of “most” ( x = 4.68, S.D.= 0.31), 3) the feasibility of e-learning lesson design using constructivism learning environment was at the level of “most” ( x = 4.72, S.D.= 0.38), 4) the feasibility of e-learning lesson design using instructional strategies and constructivism learning environment was at the level of “most” ( x = 4.73, S.D.= 0.37), 5) the feasibility of e-learning lesson design for developing higher-ordered thinking was at the level of “most” ( x = 4.68, S.D.= 0.40), 6) the feasibility of e-learning lesson design for developing instructional media and higher-ordered thinking of undergraduate students was at the level of “most” ( x = 4.64, S.D.= 0.53).