International Journal of
Information and Education Technology

Editor-In-Chief: Prof. Jon-Chao Hong
Frequency: Monthly
ISSN: 2010-3689 (Online)
E-mali: editor@ijiet.org
Publisher: IACSIT Press
 

OPEN ACCESS
3.9
CiteScore

IJIET 2025 Vol.15(11): 2476-2484
doi: 10.18178/ijiet.2025.15.11.2443

A Comparative Analysis of MOOC Platforms Using Educational Data Mining Techniques

K. S. Savita1 , Pradeep Isawasan2 , Muhammad Akmal Hakim Ahmad Asmawi2,* , Muhammad Shaheen3 , Rabiya Ghafoor4

  • 1Department of Computing, Positive Computing Center, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Malaysia
  • 2Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Perak Branch, Malaysia
  • 3Faculty of Engineering and IT, Foundation University Islamabad, Pakistan
  • 4Department of Software Engineering, Foundation University Islamabad, Pakistan

* Corresponding author

  • Manuscript receivedApril 10, 2025
  • revisedApril 27, 2025
  • acceptedMay 28, 2025
  • publishedNovember 19, 2025

Abstract

Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) and microcredential have transformed education by providing flexible and accessible learning opportunities. This study conducts a comparative analysis of MOOC platforms, focusing on Coursera and Udemy, using Educational Data Mining (EDM) techniques. The research examines differences in course volume, subject trends, learner engagement, and course structure across platforms. The findings reveal that Coursera offers fewer but more structured and academically rigorous courses, often linked to university and corporate partnerships. Udemy, in contrast, provides a vast number of shorter, skill-focused courses with greater variability in quality due to its open-marketplace model. Coursera’s courses have higher ratings and more consistent engagement, while Udemy follows a winner-takes-most pattern, where a few popular courses dominate learner interest. Text analysis of course titles highlight distinct subject preferences. Both platforms prioritize technology and business topics, but Coursera’s content aligns with long-term career pathways, whereas Udemy quickly adapts to emerging industry trends, such as blockchain and artificial intelligence. The study also identifies differences in learning pathways, with Coursera structuring its content into beginner, intermediate, and advanced levels, while Udemy heavily relies on “all-level” courses to attract a broad audience. These insights provide valuable implications for educators, policymakers, and online learning providers. Structured platforms like Coursera can strengthen their credibility through academic rigor and industry partnerships, while market-driven platforms like Udemy can enhance content discovery and quality control. Future research should explore the role of course pricing, instructor expertise, and microcredential effectiveness in learner success.

Keywords

  • Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs)
  • microcredential
  • educational data mining
  • Coursera
  • Udemy
  • text analysis
  • online education
IJIET-V15N11-2443

How to Cite

Copied

K. S. Savita, Pradeep Isawasan, Muhammad Akmal Hakim Ahmad Asmawi, Muhammad Shaheen, and Rabiya Ghafoor, "A Comparative Analysis of MOOC Platforms Using Educational Data Mining Techniques," International Journal of Information and Education Technology, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 2476-2484, 2025. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2025.15.11.2443

Copyright & License

Copyright © 2025 by the authors. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Article Metrics in Dimensions

Menu