Abstract—Interactive boards became nearly apparent
equipment of classes at basic schools. It is a type of modern
didactic mean which could increase pupil´s motivation,
contribute to activation of pupils and enable more vivid
presentation of the subject matter. From the viewpoint of the
teacher the software is the most important part of interactive
board. SmartBoard, ActivInspire and WorkSpace belong to the
most used software. We tried to compare these three
programmes with the help of comparative analysis from the
view of equipment as a whole and separate tools. Simultaneously
we added evaluating standpoint of the students – teachers on the
elected programmes and their implementation in the practice.
Index Terms—Component, formatting, style, styling; insert.
Martina Maněnová and Martin Skutil are with the Institute of Primary and Preprimary Education, Faculty of Education, University of Hradec Králové, Czech Republic (e-mail: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org).
Jana Burgerová is with the Department of Natural Sciences and Technological Disciplines, Faculty of Education, University of Presov, Presov, Slovakia (e-mail: email@example.com).
Cite: M. Maněnová, M. Skutil, and J. Burgerová, "Analysis of Teaching Programmes for Interactive Boards," International Journal of Information and Education Technology vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 690-693, 2017.